Loading Guild Resources
Loading Guild Resources
Loading Guild Resources
Before you let a property, check that you are legally permitted to do so under the documents that affect the property (or your ownership of it). The usual ones are:
If you let without the right permission, you can be in breach straight away, even if you try to sort it out afterwards. The fallout can be serious: action by a freeholder or superior landlord, a mortgage default issue, and insurance that does not respond when you need it.
If you are a leaseholder, read the lease before advertising or granting a tenancy.
Common clauses include:
If consent is needed, get it in writing before the tenancy starts. Letting first can put you in breach immediately.
In practice, consent is often routine, but a freeholder may:
If consent is refused, do not ignore it. Check the lease wording carefully, request the reasons in writing, and seek advice if you cannot resolve it sensibly.
If the property is mortgaged, read the mortgage offer and the mortgage conditions. Many lenders require you to:
Things to watch:
If you are unsure what your mortgage allows, seek advice before you grant the tenancy (often the solicitor who acted on the purchase can point you in the right direction, or you can use a specialist adviser).
Insurance is easy to miss, and it is one of the quickest ways to get caught out. Your policy may:
If you breach the conditions, your claim may be reduced or denied. Do not assume a standard owner-occupier policy covers letting.
Some homes have Section 106 planning obligations that restrict occupation or require lettings to meet specific conditions.
If you know, or even suspect, that the property is subject to a Section 106 obligation, obtain a copy and review it before you let.
From 1 May 2026, the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 (RRA 2025) includes a “read across” rule. The point is practical: many older documents refer to assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs). ASTs are being abolished, and the default model becomes a periodic assured tenancy. The Act is designed to prevent landlords from being disadvantaged solely because their paperwork still states “AST”.
In most cases, landlords and agents do not need to take any action to benefit from this.
RRA 2025 Schedule 6, Part 2 applies to certain pre-commencement instruments affecting “residential premises” in England, including:
It applies to documents entered into before 1 May 2026 (and some closely related cases where an offer/contract was made before that date). It can also capture side arrangements and consent/refusal communications (for example, “consent to let” emails) that are tied to tenancy categories.
The home referenced in the document is the “affected dwelling-house”.
For these provisions, a “relevant assured tenancy” means an assured tenancy that is:
If, immediately before 1 May 2026, an instrument (lease, mortgage, insurance, etc.) allowed letting under:
but did not allow letting under a “relevant assured tenancy”,
From 1 May 2026, it is treated as if it permits letting under a relevant assured tenancy.
That permission carries over on the same terms and in the same circumstances as the old permission, to the extent permitted by the Act. In plain terms, if the document previously stated “AST”, you should not be in breach just because the tenancy is now a monthly (or 28-day) periodic assured tenancy.
Some documents do not just specify a tenancy type; they also require that a property be let in a particular way.
If an existing instrument required letting in a way that would have been complied with by granting an AST (or other now-superseded tenancy), but would not be complied with by granting a relevant assured tenancy, then from 1 May 2026, it is treated as if it instead requires letting under a relevant assured tenancy.
Again, you assess compliance under the same circumstances and on the same terms as before, subject to the Act’s permitted terms.
If a pre-commencement Section 106 obligation prevented or restricted something unless or until the home was let under a superseded tenancy, then from 1 May 2026, it has effect as if it instead required letting under a relevant assured tenancy.
These rules apply to subletting as well as direct letting.
There is also a specific protection aimed at avoiding an accidental breach where:
The superior lease is treated as not creating a breach merely because the premises cannot be returned at the end of the term free of that relevant assured tenancy.
Nothing in these provisions stops the parties from varying a mortgage, lease, insurance contract, or obligation. The “read across” effect applies, subject to any variation.
This only fixes tenancy-type problems caused by ASTs disappearing. It does not remove other requirements in the same documents, such as:
You still need to comply with the remaining wording.
Before you grant a tenancy (and when you take on management of a new property), make sure you have:
If consent is required:
From 1 May 2026, older documents that still say “AST” should not, by themselves, put you in breach for a monthly (or 28-day) periodic assured tenancy. However, you still need to comply with any consent, notification, and other operational requirements in the underlying document.